The major difference between Layer 3 Mesh to Layer 2 is, Layer 3 Mesh AP acts as like a router yet Layer 2 Mesh AP acts as like a bridge.
That is in a Layer 3 Mesh AP network, each standalone Mesh AP will have two (relay mode) or three (gateway mode) IP Subnets. Take a Gateway Mesh AP as the example, it will have Local IP subnet, Backhaul IP subnet and the IP subnet for WAN/Internet. The Mesh AP will base on IP address to route the packets.
Then, for a Layer 2 Mesh AP, each node will act as like a 2-port or 3-port bridge or switch to forward the packets base on MAC address.
So, base on the view of network expansion, Layer 3 Mesh AP help to expand the IP network with just easily turn on the Mesh AP to bring you a new IP subnet. And the drawback is it requires more complicate installation / planning or routing knowledge. Also the packet routing will have some delay to the network performance.
And Layer 2 Mesh AP, just like an Ethernet Switch or hub, just turns it on and it will provide the Layer 2 network service for wireless user.
The following table is a brief comparison between MAP-3100 and MAP-3120.
Features | Layer 2 Mesh | Layer 3 Mesh |
Routing Protocol | AODV (Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector) | AODV + OLSR |
Device Logical Interface | 1 | 2 or 3 |
IP Network Planning | Base on system installer. One DHCP server required for the whole MESH network | No need for external DHCP, each MESH AP shall provide its own IP address via its built-in DHCP server. |
Layer 3 IP Roaming between Mesh nodes | Yes | Yes if Mobile IP sever installed. Otherwise, IP address could changed after shift to a new Mesh node. |
Wireless Clients limitation in the same Mesh Network | Yes, could be limited base on the IP Network Planning. | No. Each node represent one IP subnet, i.e. 253 users. User number can un-limited expand with a new Mesh node installed. |
Target Network | A Mesh Network below 250 users | A Mesh Network above 250 users |